28M, just started investing, looking for feedback on my 84.5% Core / 15.5% Satellite portfolio
28yo shares a core-satellite portfolio of broad ETFs, semiconductors, space, and nuclear, seeking feedback on long-term allocation.
- Strong long-term conviction in semiconductors driven by AI, data centers, and advanced manufacturing.
- Thematic investments in space and nuclear energy offer significant growth potential due to rising electricity and AI power demands.
After spending quite a bit of time learning about investing, portfolio construction, and ETFs, I finally started investing at 28 and wanted to get some feedback from people who’ve been doing this longer than I have.
My portfolio is structured as:
Core (84.5%)
VTI: 68%
VXUS: 21.1%
SMH: 10.5%
Satellite (15.5%)
ROKT/NASA (Space): 57.2%
URA/URNM (Uranium/Nuclear): 42.9%
My reasoning is that I want the vast majority of my portfolio in diversified, low-cost ETFs that capture broad market returns (VTI and VXUS). I added SMH because I’ve a strong long-term conviction in semiconductors given the growth of AI, data centers, and advanced manufacturing.
For the satellite portion, I wanted exposure to a couple of themes that I believe could’ve significant growth potential over the next 1-2 decades: Space economy (satellites/launch/defense-related aerospace, etc.)
Nuclear energy/uranium due to increasing electricity demand, AI-related power requirements.
My goal isn’t to beat the market every year or chase the latest trend. I prefer keeping most of my portfolio in diversified ETFs while reserving a smaller allocation for thematic investments and individual stocks where I have higher conviction.
I also own a few individual stocks- NVDA, SMCI, RDDT, CRWV, CCJ, SIFY, RDW, LUNR,and PL, but keep them as a small part of my portfolio to limit single-stock risk. I’ve invested about $13k total so far (ETFs + stocks + maxed Roth IRA). My focus is on consistently investing and holding long term rather than chasing short-term gains.
I’m sharing this primarily to discuss portfolio construction and the role of thematic investing within a largely passive portfolio. For those who use a core-satellite approach, how do you think about balancing broad market exposure with higher conviction themes such as semiconductors, space, or nuclear energy at the moment?
much looks good here, but consider:
- what you call conviction is likely a hunch, and one that specifically aligns with current market manias. consider also that the trends you embrace could indeed become pervasive, while earning no money (see railroads in mid-19th century);
- you say you don't intend to chase the latest trend, but you embrace exactly that, with space, nukes, chips;
- you intend to invest passively, yet you play various angles and hold thematic stocks.
investing is all about humility, i.e., the admission that you don't know the future. so, you can do your core/satellite thing, or you can be passive. if your themes don't work out so well, I predict your passive portfolio will become not so passive.
good luck.
Excellent comment.
This is one of the more reasonable portfolios I've seen from a new investor. My only feedback is that at $13k invested, your savings rate will matter far more than whether uranium beats semis or space beats the S&P. Keep contributing and don't over-tinker.
I'd consider SMH a satellite, not part of the core. It's a theme ETF with 26 holdings, not a broad market index. And I'd also count your individual stocks as satellites. That'll give you a more realistic view of your core/satellite ratio (i.e., your overall balance between broad market diversification and focused concentration).
Nine stocks also seems like a lot for smaller positions, but it's probably not a bad place to start. Over time, as you get more familiar with these companies and figure out what you like or don't like with each, you might want to put more focus into the ones you've got higher convictions in.
Otherwise seems like a solid setup... I'm not a huge fan of theme ETFs, but that's the beauty of the C&S portfolio - so long as your core provides broad index diversification, you can basically do whatever the hell you want with your satellites.
I’ve a strong long-term conviction in semiconductors given the growth of AI, data centers, and advanced manufacturing.
do you have a successful history of correctly predicting long-term industry trends?
I think I do. I align with OP’s satellite investments including semiconductors (SOXL), uranium, copper, and energy but not the space sector.
Besides the VXUS allocation I think he has a solid portfolio for an AI buildout play.
Theme ETFs are a trap that statistically underperform the market long term. They're fun while you're winning and then you think you're good so you stop checking on it, then 6 years later you look back at it and realize the sp500 is smoking you.
Don’t listen to anyone in this thread, the only advice people have is to sell everything and buy VOO.
The only mention of VOO after 12h is your comment
He scared them off
Nice bro
Thanks bro
So your advice for him is to invest in the same fund that you invest in..

r/investing