SpaceX has to grow 60x in a decade to justify a $1.75 trillion valuation. It's an impossible bar - Fortune
SpaceX's $1.75T IPO valuation requires an impossible 50% annual revenue growth for a decade, making it a highly risky bet.
- SpaceX requires an unprecedented 50% annual revenue growth for 10 years to justify its $1.75T valuation.
- The company is currently unprofitable, having lost $4.9B on $18.7B revenue in 2025.
- The massive valuation is driven by market hype rather than solid fundamentals, setting an impossible bar for investors.
(TLDR: SpaceX needs to grow revenue every year by 50% for 10 years to justify a 1.75 trillion valuation. The current revenue is 18.7b)
SpaceX needs to grow 600x in a decade to justify a $1.75 trillion valuation. No company has ever come close — Fortune
https://fortune.com/2026/06/06/spacex-ipo-stock-price-valuation/
By Shawn Tully
Senior Editor-At-Large
June 6, 2026, 3:00 AM ET
The pending SpaceX IPO is generating lots of buzz by introducing the most valuable enterprise ever to go from privately-held to publicly-traded at an expected market cap of $1.75 trillion. Clearly, that gigantic number signals investors’ confidence in the future growth and profitability of AI. But it also sets the bar for what SpaceX must achieve going forward to reward the folks and funds who bought the pre-offering shares in the underwriting, and will rush to load up when the opening bell rings at the Nasdaq at its debut, slated for mid-June.
As this writer has previously noted, one of America’s top valuation experts has put precise numbers on the benchmarks SpaceX needs to hit if investors are going to pocket anything like the gains you’d want for betting on this ultra-risky stock. David Trainer, CEO of research firm New Constructs calculated these bogeys for both revenues and profits ten years hence. It’s no secret that investors are willing to pay big based not on SpaceX’s current size and profitability, but its prospects for stupendous future growth. Indeed, SpaceX’s S-1 filing famously revealed that it lost $4.9 billion in 2025 on puny revenues of $18.7 billion.
Trainer’s model uses discounted cash flow projections to pinpoint the results SpaceX must show to justify an expected $1.75 trillion valuation. By Fortune‘s estimates, he’s positing that investors will want a total annual return of around 10% over the next decade to deem SpaceX a decent buy. That number, by the way, is extremely modest given that we’re talking an investment that the pure math judges as the longest of long shots.
By Trainer’s projections, the revenue target that would score by 2035 is the first such number ever followed by a “t,” $1.1 trillion.
That’s a stunner, especially when you consider that over the past four quarters, the highest sales posted by any U.S. company was the $742 billion recorded by Amazon. It’s also instructive to examine the extreme steepness of the growth trajectory required to lift SpaceX’s revenues today of $18.7 billion to $1.1 trillion. Garnering that almost 600x increase means hiking sales 50% a year, on average, for a decade. Here’s the haymaker: In this scenario, SpaceX’s revenues would jump from year-end 2034 to the close of 2035 from $718 billion to $1.1 trillion, maintaining the 50% annual pace needed to ring the bell, for an increase of $360 billion.
What’s the precedent for such a vertiginous ramp in just 12 months? It doesn’t exist. From 2024 to 2025, Nvidia, the fastest grower, added $85 billion in sales, one-fourth the clincher for SpaceX in the final year of Trainer’s timeline. The SpaceX “goal” of a $360 billion jump from 2035 to 2035 matches the total increase at Amazon covering the past six years.
Getting to $1.1 trillion would make SpaceX a pillar of the U.S. economy equal to over half the size of whole major industries harboring dozens of Fortune 500 members. In 2035, the CBO forecasts U.S. GDP at $46.7 trillion. So a decade hence, Elon Musk’s creation, at $1.1 trillion in revenue, would equal 2.4% of national income ($1.1 trillion divided by $46.7 trillion). That’s 50% bigger than the entire utilities sector, 55% of the entertainment industry, and nearly three-quarters of the U.S. transportation complex, a field that encompasses airlines, railroads, trucking, car rentals, and freight and logistics, and includes such giants as Delta Air Lines, CSX, and FedEx.
That’s an economic footprint no company has come close to making. The S-1 points to a moonshot total addressable AI market of nearly $30 trillion. As Trainer notes, big TAMs enable big growth, but also attract big competition. Alphabet, Microsoft, Nvidia, OpenAI and the sundry other rivals for the AI spoils can’t all grab a couple of points of GDP in sales, the prize built into SpaceX’s celestial cap. More likely, they’ll battle each other and SpaceX to chop a booming market into far smaller pieces. And reaching anything less than a never-before-witnessed share of our nation’s output will prove a big downer for Musk’s true believers. Those faithful are making SpaceX not just the largest and most widely-lauded IPO ever, but sadly, far-and-away the most expensive.
Bro this stock is a IQ Test 🤤
Its a pump and dump, like Trumpcoin, and people think they can exit before it falls.
I really don't think it is, but I think it's going to end up like Boeing where space travel is just it's own industry that might end up having its own cycles.
I'd bet on the chinese actually to be the competition.
There is always a reason why Privat equity wants to take profits 😅
I mean TSLA has a PE of 350+. It is unsurprising SpaceX will be similarly treated. Once the market resets, it will be ugly for bag holders of both stocks.
Absolutely ridiculous. The IPO is going to be a bloodbath in favor of the Epstein class.
Am I going to join the IPO with a super small position for my occasional adrenaline requirement and to try to hopefully outsmart Elon Musk crypto retard fanfolk by re-selling after a few hours?
Is this value investing?
_Absolutely_
The IPO is going to be a bloodbath in favor of the Epstein class.
Wealth redistribution ... from poor to rich.
Indeed! trickle-down economics doesn’t transfer fast enough. So now we have US President-level mass grifting, early-index inclusion for faster bag offloading (of course the whole private equity industry is already a bullshit elitist protection layer from all of you low level peasants, by itself)
Wait, you’re going to participate?? Lol
The only winning here is to stay as far away as possible.
Math doesnt math here. 50% growth for a decade is x60 not x600.
Also the whole preassumption of this article is that we live in a world that makes sense. We don’t.
most unfortunate title typo ever
Don't short. The float is a minuscule 4%. Just avoid.
This wouldn't even be legal in most countries lol. I think UK, EU have a minimum 10% criteria.
TBF we used to require 10% or some of our indexes .... they changed the rules for our oligarch overlords.
I read the prospectus dude. They are developing an economy that doesn't exist, the LUNAR economy. That means theoretically it can be infinitely big. Plus Musk said if aliens turn up they will be well positioned to be at the forefront of trading with them. That's worth at least a trillion in valuation IMO
Ketamine addict
Remember when he told us Tesla would be selling robot cat girl sex slaves by 2028? God kematine Musk was gloriously stupid
Was aliens mentioned in prospectus?
anthropic has been growing 10x every year the past 3 years.
easy when you start at a small number. Spacex been around a decade or so
You are probably going to get destroyed trying to short SpaceX. The buy pressure from institutions that track the NASDAQ 100 and the small float will mean you will almost certainly get short squeezed.
What if he OD's on Ketamine?
I find it hilarious that people really think that SpaceX will just take over the global communication market. As if local carriers and networks would just lay down and sell everything to SpaceX.
That doesn't make sense. If they grew the revenue by 600x then they would have $10.8 trillion in revenue by 2035. If we assume a profit margin of 10% that would still be $1 trillion in net income. Even with a P/E of 10 they would be worth $10 trillion at that point.
They will probably get a huge, but brief, boost this quarter too since they are leasing out datacenter compute for billions for like 6 months.
That said, their growth has actually been slowing down: 125% in 2022 -> 2023, 35% in 2023 -> 2024, 33% in 2024 -> 2025 and Q1 2026 15%.
I’m skeptical to say the least. I have not been particularly impressed with any of the Musk companies, they rely too heavily on business subterfuge over being competitive. For example, I was in Brazil recently and rode a lot of BYD ubers. They’re nicer than Teslas. I asked about the price of them and they were much more affordable than Teslas and not even particularly uncommon. If BYD were to come to the USA, Tesla would be wiped out in <1 year
xAI isn’t terrible but they keep lobotimizing it to feed Musk’s ego, which is really really not a good sign to me
SpaceX… I dunno man, I see some utility, but I see it as providing a cover for these other two companies as it’s the most competent with the most legitimate achievements. I don’t feel comfortable with these other companies being rolled in, particularly, it gives the vibe of those subprime mortgages where they added in a bunch of junk to the package that you’re buying
Why short when you can just decide not to buy. Just buy great companies at great prices, I don't think this IPO fills either categories.
Lmao. Absolutely ridiculous. How can anyone justifying buying SpaceX at this valuation?! It shouldn't be worth more than 200B imo.
Its 600x, not 60x.
Puts put your theoretical losses at a cap

r/valueinvesting