Some honest assessment of my investing strategy and why "steady but surely" beats "get rich now" if you're not devoted to trading
Author reflects on underperforming the market via active trading and options, concluding passive index investing is superior.
- Passive index ETFs consistently outperform active stock picking and market timing over the long term.
- Avoids the stress, tax complications, and emotional pitfalls of frequent trading and options gambling.
I've recently been dealing with a lot of stress due to losses trading and not timing the AI boom properly, leaving me not only in the red but relatively much worse than if I had just bought an indexed ETF following the general market. This led to me doing some assessment of how much money I would have made had I followed the wisdom of the crowd and not try to DYI my investments.
I've held most of my NW in cash, around ~$200k because since 2022 I've been waiting for "The Big Crash" and doing taxes for stocks in the country where I live is a pain in the ass. I have about $150k in two other accounts in the US and LATAM where I can trade more easily. In 2022 I was able to "beat the market" by staying in cash and riding my country's burgeoning bull market to a paltry +7.5% for the year (much better than $SPY's -18% or $QQQ -32.5%).
In 2023, I kept doing stock-picking and managed an improved +12.8% performance which this time underperformed the SP500 (26%) and NASDAQ (54.8%). I still kept most of my money in cash so these profits were mostly from trading with around ~20-30% of my NW.
In 2024 I had my best year, obtaining profits for +22.9% of my NW and still I underperformed the SP500 (24.9%) and NASDAQ (25.5%). These two years my stock picks were mostly bad but were salvaged by some good selections in my country's stock market, which boomed 58.3% and _120%_ respectively those years.
But the next year the stock market in my country began a bear market. I was -$10k on the year after Liberation Day and began to panic. I felt that any new investment I could make could potentially be "the top" and could only make my yearly losses worse. Then I started gambling with options. I had some good luck playing earnings and 0DTEs and managed to salvage the year and finish another paltry +13% (vs. 17.72% by SP500 and 20.77% by NASDAQ).
This year, my bad performance picking stocks caught up with my luck running out with options. I've lost up to -$20k so far in the year while SP500 is +8.45% and NASDAQ is +14.92%.
This got me thinking: what would have been my performance if I had invested in ETFs instead of trying this bizarre combination of conservative + gambling trading approach?
I ran some backtests assuming I maxed out my pension contributions (I don't have the exact performance data since I'm not subscribed but since I'm Europe-based I assumed it would follow $IEUR) and I put the rest on $QQQ. The result is that I would have been about 15% richer. And that's with a conservative approach of investing only about $1000 in $QQQ and over $3000 (assuming employer contributions) in $IEUR. And I'm not even accounting for bonuses. _And_ I'm also not taking into account the enormous amount of stress trying to reach my yearly +10% goal takes on my mental health each year, which would have basically been 0 with passive investing.
The point of this post is a bit of public auto-shaming and also a warning for whoever is also trying to "trade" while holding a full time job. I'm not sure it's worth it unless you're _really_ committed, i.e. you spend your weekends reading books, reading balances, analysing stocks, building bots and algorithms and setting up notifications to stay over your investments.
Well at least you’ve learned the error of your past ways. And btw it doesn’t matter how committed any individual is to trading. They will lag overall market returns over a 5+ period 95% or more of the time.
The only people who should be trading are those who do it as a profession for an investment firm, where they can lag market returns over time on the company’s dime but still earn a strong income to be able to invest in reg boring index funds for their own portfolio.
Literally everything beats “get rich now”. Even serious traders aren’t going for that. That’s gambling and it’s shit odds. You might as well just go put it all on red 32 and save yourself the trouble of “learning” and “research” (a lot of which is total bullshit anyway).
More importantly, actual intelligent non-gambling trading isn’t even good either. The enormous majority of active traders lose to the broad market, and the longer your time horizon gets, the larger that majority grows. Damn near nobody beats it when you get out to 20+ years, and you have to consider the time and effort that goes into that shitty performance too. It’s just a bad idea for all but the tiniest group of people. And those people might just be the luckiest ones anyway.
What's your list of picks?
Thank you for providing the outcome of your experiment with stock picking. I feel so often like I'm making a mistake by just buying VOO/VXUS (and, recently, rebalancing to a 10% SPMO tilt) and that I'm being 'left behind' by not holding stocks that moon...sounds like I need to just stay the course and trust VOO to do its thing.
Mind: like I said, it didn't work for me and I'll admit I've never done proper due dilligence. I've mostly followed flows. But I'm also not saying that if you "spend your weekends reading books, reading balances, analysing stocks, building bots and algorithms and setting up notifications to stay over your investments" you are _guaranteed_ to at least keep up with the general market

r/investing