redditalpha logoredditalpha
← Back to dashboard
Share
1100%
r/investingr/investing· u/XTheToastyNinjaX· 5d ago 0

What do you think of the growth section of my portfolio?

Investor summaryNeutral

User seeks advice on rebalancing the 40% growth portion of their portfolio, considering swapping QQQM for AVUV, VXUS, and XMMO.

Post body

Currently I have 60% of my portfolio in VOO.

The rest (growth section) I have allocated to QQQM, SPMO and VGT.

Currently thinking about reducing or removing QQQM and adding AVUV, VXUS and possibly XMMO. (This is all contained in the 40% growth section outside of VOO. Do these changes make sense? Or would sticking with QQQM be better? How would you organize the growth section of a portfolio after having a foundation in the SP500?

Discussion · top comments3 selected
u/booobReviewer 2· 5d ago

Your instinct to swap out QQQM is solid, but maybe not for the reasons you

think. VOO already has heavy mega-cap tech exposure (NVDA, AAPL, MSFT are

~20% of VOO). Adding QQQM, SPMO, and VGT on top of that gives you massive

overlap — basically your whole portfolio is US large-cap growth.

Swapping QQQM for AVUV (small-cap value) and VXUS (international) would

actually diversify you. AVUV gives you exposure to smaller companies that

are historically cheaper and have higher expected returns (the Fama-French

value premium). VXUS gives you non-US exposure, which reduces your

country-specific risk.

For the remaining "growth" allocation, VGT already covers tech. You could

drop SPMO as well (it's momentum factor, which overlaps with growth) and

just hold VOO + VGT for US, then add AVUV + VXUS for diversification.

u/smashnmashbruh 2· 5d ago

It’s all basically the same.

Nvidia alone makes up nearly 12% of your entire portfolio, and just four stocks (NVDA, AVGO, MSFT, AAPL) will be over 30%.

u/Phuffu 1· 4d ago

Consider value and international stocks.