redditalpha logoredditalpha
← Back to dashboard
Share
1100%
r/stocksr/stocks· u/Useful_Tangerine4340· 2d agoBroad market news 0

Warren Buffett's Market Indicator Tops 232.1% as US Stocks Trade at Extreme Valuations: Why It Matters

Investor summaryBearish

Buffett's market indicator hits a record 232.1%, signaling extreme US stock valuations and historically preceding market downturns.

Bear points
  • Buffett indicator hit a record high of 232.1%, indicating extreme US stock valuations.
  • Historically, similar peaks in the late 1960s, 2000, and 2021 were precursors to severe market downturns and bear markets.
SPY降息与宏观
Post body

https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/buffett-stock-market-gauge-record-high-1802117

Warren Buffett's time-tested stock market gauge just surged to an all-time high of 232.1%, showing that US stock valuations have reached extreme levels.

Historically, such elevated Buffett indicator levels have been precursors to market downturns. In the late 1960s, Buffett's indicator approached similarly high levels, as it did in 2000 during the dot-com bubble, and again in late 2021. After the 2021 peak of 197%, the US stock market experienced a prolonged bear market. Similarly, when the indicator hit 190% during the dot-com bubble, the market subsequently declined sharply.

Discussion · top comments42 selected
u/Iulian1988 333· 2d agoTop

This fking metric surges for 5 years now

u/kisuke228 57· 2d agoTop

Long the metric lul

u/DecembersDragons 54· 2d agoTop

That metric is obsolete. Most corporations are international now.

Better to just look at overall market PE and forward PE. As far as valuation goes.

u/milkplantation 12· 1d ago

Buffett himself has said it's obsolete. That said, most measures of the market such as the Shiller PE Ratio, Price/Sales, Price/Earnings, 10 Year US Treasury Interest Rates, S&P 500 Dividend Yield, you'll see that by almost any metric the market is fully valued or richly valued. That's not to say overvalued.

I think that's why so many people clash on this subject. The market isn't on the verge of crash but it is richly valued. Expensive, but not ready to burst. That implies more risk, but also less downside. It's difficult to rationalize those two things, and it tends to put people into a state of paralysis where they can't act, or a state of cognitive dissonance where they choose to believe this time is different.

The truth is, we're kind of just playing a game of chicken. The more expensive stocks get relative to their cash flows, the more risk is taken on. Right now we're all taking on more risk but there's little else to be done.

u/garden_speech 1· 1d ago
That implies more risk, but also less downside.

This doesn't make any sense. Higher valuations are riskier because they have more downside.

u/Ok-Introduction-1940 14· 2d ago

Most useless metric ever.

u/Belaroth 183· 2d agoTop

This metric compares only US GDP to US stock market, but market is now more global. More than 40% money in US stocks are from other countires. More people invest now than before, investing is more accessable to everyone. And so on, many things changed.

u/billFclinton 57· 2d agoTop

This is the biggest counter point in my opinion. Apple, Microsoft, google, meta, Nvidia, Amazon, Coca-Cola, Eli lily, you name an SP500 company, they all get way more international revenue than any company did back when this indicator was first popularized

u/DoritoSteroid 1· 2d ago

So now when it crashes, everybody gets butt graped!

u/Wonderful-Sail-1126 19· 2d ago

More than half of all Apple revenue is from overseas. US companies are more international than ever. This metric is no longer relevant.

It should really be World GDP to stock market cap.

u/channel_matrix 1· 1d ago

Retail entering the market after COVID changed the game completely. It's the wild west now.

u/Chris_Cornell_is_God 70· 2d agoTop

The casino doesn't care about metrics and fundamentals.

u/unia_7 15· 2d ago

The metric is broken because it fails to account for the fact that US companies can earn income abroad.

u/tech1983 57· 2d agoTop

Vibes. Everything runs on vibes and tweets now

u/Numerous-Stand-1841 41· 2d ago

Outdated metric

u/Motor-Region-1011 29· 2d ago

Meta is like 18 p/e....i dont see anything extreme...in fact i see undervalued assest...like Microsoft...etc

u/DoritoSteroid 1· 2d ago

Other than IG, Meta doesn't have much going for it product-wise..

u/Zorkonio 24· 2d ago

Lol oh no not the great bear market of 2022.

u/XSC 1· 1d ago

Also known as the "I should had fucking bought more" era

u/Zorkonio 1· 1d ago

I was betting against Nvidia in 2022 because the 4000 series cards seemed not great value lol. Oh was I wrong

u/InjuryEmbarrassed532 17· 2d ago

Sure thing, even if it happens, it will be bought up by the asset owning class pretty quickly.

The time of the middle class is over, it was a nice post WW2 experiment.

It would take a lot more disruption and pain than some arbitrary “market crash” to bring us back to ideals of the past.

u/Treydroo 1· 2d ago

How van i invest in the metric?

u/Double_Suggestion385 1· 2d ago

Even Buffett denounced this metric. Doomers on reddit love it though.

u/FabricationLife 1· 2d ago

nope.

u/Own_Magazine_7035 1· 2d ago

It was 250% when Nasdaq was 12k

What’s your point, this is old metric, before technological moats existed

u/Choice_Potato_6279 1· 2d ago

We're gonna crash easilly to Nasdaq to 5k

u/Mapag 1· 2d ago

It doesnt matter anymore because people buy the story, not the fondamental!

u/SubstantialSnacker 1· 2d ago

Maybe when most of the markets are actually ran by people. 70% of trades today are algorithms/bots

u/Ayye_Human 1· 2d ago

The middle class can afford to buy assets right now. I wouldn’t say physical real estate but anyone can buy stocks. There is still a ton of attractively priced assets for under $100 or even $50 per share.

u/Skalawag2 1· 2d ago

My tulip sentiment tracker has been quiet so I’m not concerned.

u/Choice_Potato_6279 1· 2d ago

Stocks gonna crash by 50%, enjoy bagholders.

u/theaveragethiopian 1· 1d ago

In the long term, GDP growth averages 2% growth, stock market averages 10% growth. Isn't there a natural upward drift of the ratio of two numbers that grow at different rates

u/AttilaTH3Hen 1· 1d ago

Stay broke fam ✌️

u/DoritoSteroid 1· 1d ago

Doing better than you fam ✌🏼

u/AttilaTH3Hen 1· 1d ago

Big super doubt but glad you feel that way. META will be a bigger company 5 years from now. If you don’t see that, that’s your problem!

u/DoritoSteroid 1· 1d ago

It's too big to fail, of course it'll still be around and likely doing decently well. But its stock won't grow as much as other companies.

u/Realistic_Record9527 1· 1d ago

It’s extremely stupid when everyone takes this indicator lol 😂

u/Wonderful-Sail-1126 1· 1d ago

But tech companies are carrying and they’re uniquely able to expand to overseas markets. ChatGPT barely has to change to expand all over the world instantly.

u/Electrical_Regret537 1· 1d ago

Don’t the guy just buy a metric ton of Google though? Thats why most of this stuff is noise.

u/brick_gnarlson 1· 1d ago

what the fuck does extreme valuations mean? is this just the author's made-up term? be precise.

u/Fun-Imagination-2488 1· 1d ago

1999-2000 was a generational opportunity to buy beaten down value stocks.

Don’t sell just because the market is expensive, just make sure youre getting a good deal on the companies youre buying and youll be fine